Cognitive and Functional Abilities in an Older Adult Veteran Before and After Contracting COVID-19.

Background: A 76-year-old male Veteran with a historical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment was assessed at baseline and follow-up as part of two separate, ongoing studies. He was diagnosed with COVID-19 during the interim. Objective: To report potential effects on cognitive and functional abilities measured before and after contracting COVID-19. Methods: The patient was administered a series of cognitive tests and self-report procedures assessing cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric status. Results: Overall, no discernable pattern of cognitive changes between pre-COVID and post-COVID assessments were noted. Only mild increases in agitation, depression, and irritability were noted on a self-report measure. However, this particular subject has relatively ideal psychosocial circumstances in comparison to the typical older adult Veteran male. It is hypothesized that improved psychosocial conditions will result in less negative cognitive and functional outcomes for older adults diagnosed with COVID-19. Conclusion: High levels of resilience, social support, and exercise, coupled with lower levels of perceived stress and loneliness may serve as protective factors against cognitive and functional decline in older adults who contract COVID-19.

Impact of COVID pandemic on neuropsychiatric symptoms and caregiver distress in cognitively impaired older adults

Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are cardinal symptoms of dementia. They are often associated with functional decline, poor quality of life, and caregiver burden. Anecdotal reports have suggested increase in NPS during the COVID pandemic. However, decreased time demands on the caregivers could be hypothesized to have improved relationships and indirectly NPS. There has been limited literature on whether NPS improved or worsened during the current pandemic. The current study examines the prevalence of NPS and changes in NPS profile during the pandemic. Loneliness, cognition, function, and caregiver distress were also studied. Methods The COVID Dementia study is an ongoing cross-sectional study of community dwelling cognitively impaired older adults (N=102). Loneliness was assessed with the 3-item loneliness questionnaire, cognition with the Tele-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA), and functional status with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Neuropsychiatry symptoms including severity and distress were collected using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and change during COVID was also recorded for each symptom. Results Mean age was 73.0 (±8.0) years, 96.1% male, 42.2% rural, 75.2% Caucasian, and 24.8% non-Caucasian. T-MoCA and FAQ mean scores were 15.2 (±4.6) and 8.0 (±9.3), respectively. Loneliness was prevalent in majority of participants (53.5%). Mean loneliness score was 4.7 (±2.1). Mean NPI total severity and total distress were 7.5 (±6.5) and 10.9 (±8.8), respectively. Irritability and night-time behavior were most frequently reported symptoms (45.7% each), followed by anxiety (45.3%), and agitation (41.1%). Majority of the participants reported worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms during COVID (61.5%). Irritability, agitation, and anxiety was the cluster that was reported as most frequently worsened symptoms during the pandemic followed by depression and apathy cluster (Fig. 1). Among those that reported worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms, 66.1% noted an increase in ≥ two symptoms. Conclusions Older adults with pre-existent cognitive impairment may be at high risk for loneliness and worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms during the COVID pandemic. Some NPS might worsen more frequently during the pandemic and need particular attention.

Loneliness, social connectedness, and resilience during COVID pandemic among those with and without cognitive impairment

Background Loneliness in older adults is multifactorial. Social connectedness and resilience are protective against loneliness and have been adversely affected by the COVID pandemic. The objective was to measure loneliness in older adults with and without cognitive impairment and to compare the interaction of loneliness with resilience and social connectedness in these subgroups. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in community dwelling older adults (N=254) (November 2020-ongoing). Demographic data were collected along with variables related to social determinants of health. Loneliness was assessed with the 3-item loneliness questionnaire, resilience with the Brief Resilience Coping Scale (BRCS) and social connectedness using the 6-item Lubben social network scale. Results Mean age was 74.6 (±8.0) years, 93.7% male, 50.8% rural, 79.5% Caucasian, and 17.3% African American. Mean education was 14 years (±2.4). The majority of the participants reported loneliness (57.5%). Mean Lubben social network score was 14.7 (±7.1) and mean resilience score was 15.0 (±4.1). Loneliness was higher in those living alone compared to those living with someone (5.6 vs. 4.6, p<0.001, 95% CI: -1.6, -0.48). There were strong negative correlations between social connectedness and loneliness (p<0.001, r=-0.43) and resilience and loneliness (p=0.001, r=-0.19). Compared to those without cognitive impairment (N=151), participants with cognitive impairment (N=101) had a significantly lower mean social network score (p=0.007, 95% CI: 0.69, 4.23). Compared to those without cognitive impairment, participants with cognitive impairment had lower mean resilience score, however the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.080, 95% CI: -0.11, 1.97). T-MoCA and FAQ mean scores for the cognitively impaired older adults were 15.2 (±4.6) and 8.0 (±9.3), respectively. The strong negative correlation between resilience and loneliness scores persisted in the subgroup with cognitive impairment (p=0.028, r=-0.22). Conclusions Loneliness was commonly reported among older adults during the COVID pandemic. Loneliness was negatively correlated with social connectedness and resilience. Compared to cognitively intact counterparts, those with cognitive impairment reported significantly lower social connectedness. This finding indicates that those with cognitive impairment may need more attention during natural disasters that foster physical separation.

Loneliness and Social Isolation: Determinants of Cardiovascular Outcomes.

One in three Americans report experiencing loneliness in everyday life, a number that has grown exponentially over the last few decades. As we respond to the SARS-COV2 pandemic with quarantine and social distancing, social isolation and feelings of loneliness are increasing among people of all ages. This presents as an opportune time to recognize the public health impact of these important psychosocial determinants. Loneliness and social isolation are associated with a higher incidence of CVD, higher healthcare utilization and worse outcomes even after controlling for conventional risk factors of CVD. In this review, we discuss loneliness and social isolation as determinants of cardiovascular outcomes, the pathophysiology of this association, and its implications in clinical practice. We discuss some of the shortcomings in the assessment of loneliness and social isolation while identifying the most commonly used rating scales for the same. Finally, we suggest modifications to interventions for loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Stress of Overseas Long-Distance Care During COVID-19: Potential "CALM"ing Strategies.

"CALM"ing strategies during COVID-19 pandemic. Created with BioRender.com.

A systematic review of loneliness and social isolation scales used in epidemics and pandemics.

The COVID-19 pandemic has heightened social isolation and loneliness. There is a lack of consensus on rating scales to measure these constructs. Our objectives were to identify commonly used loneliness and social isolation scales over the last two decades and test their user characteristics. 7928 articles were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and APA PsychINFO databases. 41 articles were included based on study criteria. Among fourteen scales reported, UCLA 3-item loneliness scale was found to be most commonly used. The scale is specifically developed for telephone use and is the fastest taking less than a minute for self-administration.

An Aspect of Kumbh Mela Massive Gathering and COVID-19.

Purpose of Review: Kumbh Mela, a religious gathering of Hindus held in India, is the largest massive gathering event in the world. The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented healthcare crisis in recent times with effects reverberating in all spheres of human lives. India has registered the second highest number of COVID-19 cases. This paper aims to dwell in the religious and social background of Kumbh Mela massive gathering, as well as the ritualistic practices that could potentially entail public health risks in the current situation. It also aims to identify possible preparatory and interventional measures to evade such risks. Recent Findings: In recent years, the increase in the number of people attending the Kumbh Mela has been phenomenal. Congregants are put up at the holy sites for several days. The sheer number of people assembling at the religious venues poses a great challenge to manage the crowds, to cater to the requirements of basic amenities, and to meet their healthcare needs. Some of the ritualistic practices could heighten the risk for transmission of respiratory pathogens. The COVID-19 pandemic has escalated over the past few months in India. The pandemic is expected to sustain its tempo in India throughout the foreseeable future. Organization of the forthcoming Kumbh Mela needs meticulous planning. Summary: Kumbh Mela is a Hindu religious gathering at the banks of India's rivers, held periodically. It witnesses assembly of huge numbers of people and has the potential to amplify the COVID-19 pandemic in India; this could overwhelm the healthcare system.

VA Video Connect for Clinical Care in Older Adults in a Rural State During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the need for telehealth at home. Although the Department of Veterans Affairs is a leading provider of telehealth, disparities may exist in reaching older veterans living in rural areas. VA Video Connect (VVC) is a video conferencing app that enables veterans to connect with their health care provider via a secure and private session. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the capability and willingness of older veterans to participate in a VVC visit during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on older veterans (N=118) at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System. Participants were interviewed over the phone and responses to the following items were recorded: availability of internet, email, and an electronic device with a camera; veterans' willingness to complete an appointment via a VVC visit; and availability of assistance from a caregiver for those who were unable to participate in a VVC visit alone. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 72.6 (SD 8.3) years, 92% (n=108) were male, 69% (n=81) were Caucasian, 30% (n=35) were African Americans, and 36% (n=42) lived in a rural location. The majority reported having access to the internet (n=93, 77%) and email service (n=83, 70%), but only 56% (n=67) had a camera-equipped device. Overall, 53% (n=63) were willing and capable of participating in a VVC visit. The availability of internet access was significantly lower in rural compared to nonrural participants (P=.045) and in those with or less than a high school education compared to those who pursued higher education (P=.02). Willingness to participate in the VVC visit was significantly lower in rural compared to nonrural participants (P=.03). Of the participants who reported they were able and willing to partake in a VVC visit (n=54), 65% (n=35) opted for VVC and 35% (n=19) preferred a phone visit. In total, 77% (n=27) of the scheduled VVC visits were successful. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in technology, and willingness on the part of health care systems, there are some lingering issues with capability and willingness to participate in video telehealth visits, particularly among older adults residing in rural areas.

Neuropsychological and Functional Impact of COVID-19 on Mild Cognitive Impairment.

We present a case report to showcase that behavioral, cognitive, and functional decline may be associated with COVID-19 stay-home guidance among older adults with pre-existent cognitive impairment. In a functionally independent and physically active older adult with Mild Cognitive Impairment, there was worsening in depression and anxiety symptoms associated with the restrictions of COVID-19. Functional decline was also noted as assessed by Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. We discuss solutions to mitigate the effects of COVID-19 restrictions in this vulnerable population.

Participant and Caregiver Perspectives on Clinical Research During Covid-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has massively disrupted essential clinical research. Many regulatory organizations have rightfully advocated to temporarily halt enrollment and curtail all face-to-face interactions. Views and opinions of patients and their caregivers are seldom considered while making such decisions. The objective was to study older participants' and their caregivers' perspectives to participate in ongoing clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: VISN-16/Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Department of Veterans Affairs. PARTICIPANTS: Older participants and their caregivers (N = 51) enrolled in ongoing clinical research studies. MEASUREMENTS: Questions about perceptions of safety to attend research visit, the level of panic among the general public, and medical center's preparedness in handling the pandemic. Other questions identified the source of pandemic information and the preference of a phone or in-person visit. RESULTS: Mean age was 69.3 (±9.4) years, 53% were male, 39% were caregivers, and 65% were Caucasian. Majority (78%) of the participants felt safe/very safe attending the scheduled research appointment; 63% felt that the extra screening made them feel safe/very safe; 82% felt that the medical center was prepared/very prepared for the pandemic. Participants split evenly on their preference for phone versus in-person visits. Family members and television news media were the commonly used sources of pandemic information irrespective of their education. Perceptions were influenced by gender and source of information, not by age or education. Females perceived higher level of panic compared to males (P = .02). Those relying on news media felt safer compared to those that relied on family members (P = .008). CONCLUSION: Even though informants felt that the medical center was prepared to handle the pandemic, only half the participants preferred the in-person visit. Pandemic information was obtained from family members or the television news media. Knowing patients' perspectives may help researchers be better prepared for future pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:E14-E18, 2020.

Conducting Clinical Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Investigator and Participant Perspectives.

As the medical landscape changes daily with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical researchers are caught off-guard and are forced to make decisions on research visits in their ongoing clinical trials. Although there is some guidance from local and national organizations, the principal investigator (PI) is ultimately responsible for determining the risk-benefit ratio of conducting, rescheduling, or cancelling each research visit. The PI should take into consideration the ethical principles of research, local/national guidance, the community risk of the pandemic in their locale, staffing strain, and the risk involved to each participant, to ultimately decide on the course of action. While balancing the rights and protection of the human subject, we seldom examine patients' views and opinions about their scheduled research visit(s). This article discusses the ethical principles of beneficence and autonomy in helping the decision-making process. We discuss ways to weigh-in local and national guidance, staffing strain, and institutional support into the decision-making process and outline potential changes needed for regulatory bodies depending on the decision. Further, we discuss the need to weigh-in the individual risk-benefit ratio for each participant and present a decision tree to navigate this complex process. Finally, we examine participant and caregiver perspectives on their fears, sense of preparedness, and factors that they consider before deciding whether to keep or postpone the research appointments. This entry also provides PIs ways to support their research participants in both scenarios, including provision of psychological support.